School
Choice
What is school choice? School choice is the process of allowing
every family to choose the K-12 educational options that best fit
their children. Every child is unique, and all children learn
differently. Some children might succeed at the neighborhood public
school, while others might fit in better at a charter, magnet,
online, private or home learning environment. That’s why school
choice is so important! These options include all forms of
education, from traditional
public schools, to public
charter schools, public
magnet schools, private
schools, online
academies, and homeschooling.
Every child deserves an effective, challenging, and motivating
education. And, because each
student has their own unique set of talents, interests, and
challenges, having a variety of options in education is crucial.
What works well for one child may not work well for another child!
In short, school choice ensures that each student can find a
learning environment that allows them to be inspired,
successful, and happy.
(National School Choice Week)
Critical Race Theory
Critical race theory (CRT) is a framework
of analysis and an academic movement of civil-rights scholars
and activists who seek to examine the intersection of race and law
in the United States and to challenge mainstream American
liberal approaches to racial
justice.[1][2][4] CRT
examines social, cultural, and legal issues primarily as they relate
to race and racism
in the United States.[6] A
tenet of CRT is that racism and disparate racial outcomes are the
result of complex, changing, and often subtle social and
institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional
prejudices of individuals.[7][8]
CRT originated in the mid-1970s in the writings of several American
legal scholars, including Derrick
Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé
Crenshaw, Richard
Delgado, Cheryl
Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari
Matsuda, and Patricia
J. Williams.[1] It
emerged as a movement by the 1980s, reworking theories of critical
legal studies (CLS) with more focus on race.[1] CRT
is grounded in critical
theory[10] and
draws from thinkers such as Antonio
Gramsci, Sojourner
Truth, Frederick
Douglass, and W.
E. B. DuBois, as well as the Black
Power, Chicano,
and radical
feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s.[1]
CRT scholars view race and white
supremacy as an intersectional social
construct[7] that
advances the interests of white
people[11] at
the expense of persons of other races.[12][13][14] In
the field of legal studies, CRT emphasizes that formally colorblind laws
can still have racially
discriminatory outcomes.[15] A
key CRT concept is intersectionality,
which emphasizes that race can intersect with other identities (such
as gender and class) to produce complex combinations of power and
advantage.[16]
Academic critics of CRT argue that CRT relies on social
constructionism, elevates storytelling over evidence and reason,
rejects the concepts of truth and merit, and opposes liberalism.[17]
Since 2020, conservative U.S. lawmakers have sought to ban or
restrict the instruction of critical race theory along with other anti‑racism education.[8][19] These
lawmakers have been accused of misrepresenting the tenets and
importance of CRT, and that the goal of their restrictions is to
broadly silence discussions of racism, equality, social
justice, and the history of race.[20][21][22]
(Wikipedia)
Common Core
The
Common Core State Standards Initiative
is
an educational initiative from 2010 that details what
K–12 students
throughout the
United
States should know in
English
language arts and
mathematics at
the conclusion of each
school
grade. The initiative is sponsored by the following
organizations:
The initiative also seeks to establish consistent educational
standards across the states as well as ensure that students
graduating from high school are prepared to enter credit-bearing
courses at two- or four-year college programs or to enter the workforce.[1]
In the 1990s, a movement began in the U.S. to establish national
educational standards for students across the country.
- (a) outlining what students
were expected to know and do at each grade level
- (b) implementing ways to find
out if they were meeting those standards.[2]
Reception and
Criticism
The Common Core State Standards have drawn both support and
criticism from politicians, analysts, and commentators. Teams of
academics and educators from around the United States led the
development of the standards, and additional validation teams
approved the final standards. The teams drew on public feedback that
was solicited throughout the process and that feedback was
incorporated into the standards.[49] The
Common Core initiative only specifies what students should know at
each grade level and describes the skills that they must acquire in
order to achieve college or career readiness. Individual school
districts are responsible for choosing curricula based on the
standards.[49] Textbooks
bearing a Common Core label are not verified by any agency and may
or may not represent the intent of the Common Core Standards. Some
critics believe most current textbooks are not actually aligned to
the Common Core, while others disagree.[50]
(Wikipedia)